Allopathic and Traditional Health Practitioners: A Reply to Nemuthandani, Hendricks and Mulaudzi
An earlier paper in this journal reported on the perception and experience of 77 allopathic
health practitioners (AHPs) and health managers about working together with South African
traditional health practitioners (THPs). The paper stated that the abolishment of the Witchcraft
Suppression Act of 1957 and the introduction of the Traditional Health Practitioners Act No. 22 of
2007 is a milestone in the development of traditional health knowledge, and for the eventual
incorporation thereof into modern health care practices. The authors also comment that a
decolonisation of mindset and a change of attitude is required to change one’s perception of
traditional healer practices and to develop them parallel to allopathic health practice. This
opinion paper is a response to the paper, to negate its claims about the Witchcraft Suppression
Act of 1957 and to provide clarity on the Traditional Health Practitioners Act No. 22 of 2007 and
related policies and regulations. Although this Act recognises THP, the Act and other
regulations actually require THP to conform to practices analogous to those of AHP. It is rather
a systematic and scientific ‘mindset’ that is required to develop THP parallel to AHP. The
Traditional Health Practitioners Act of 2007 and the Draft Policy on African Traditional Medicine
(TM) for South Africa dictate that a substantial THP sectoral transformation is required before
there can be a parallel system. Legislation and regulations have excluded